Surprisingly the process of managing project costs, as many
other areas of project management, requires a set process to be followed. By
breaking down the activities involved and following a step-by-step approach, the
project team will be in position to address cost estimation, determine the
budget and control the project cost.
As mentioned, the size of a project (based on scope) adds or
reduces complexity. That means that certain tasks and activities in small size
or scope projects will be integrated, which leads to the misinterpretation that
these tasks have not been taken into account. That is not the case. Each of
those steps is to be taken separately and when appropriate to be integrated. When
a project manager or a project team decides to integrate tasks for various
reasons, they are effectively affecting the projects lifecycle.
Cost estimation and budgeting is a common area that task integration
occurs in small scope projects. Reasons such as prior experience and knowledge,
pre-set costs, or fixed budgets can reduce time and complexity.
A simplistic approach on cost estimation and budgeting can be
initiated in parallel with the development of WBS. By allocating cost estimates
in each activity and task, effectively a project budget can be produced. Once
again, the level of complexity and detail is to follow scope specification and sponsor/stakeholder
approval. On a similar note, the process of cost estimation and budgeting can be
implemented in parallel with PERT development.
A number of project teams follow the paradigm of “resources
pool”; a concept that there is a budgetary allocation for the project and the
team is allocating monetary resources in combination with other human and
non-human resources. In cases as such, flexibility is exercised and creativity
is required.
Links between project cost, project time, and project
quality are to be reviewed regularly and reported accordingly. Cost is a finite
resource and does affect a number of project parameters.
BL